Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Norsk | Polski | Português | Pусский | Suomi | Svenska | US
Euro Huntington's disease network [logo]
[2018-07-21-0370] EHDN 2014 - Evaluation & Feedback Survey -
The European Huntington's Disease Network would be most grateful if you could take a few minutes to complete the following anonymous and confidential questionnaire. Your evaluation and your comments will help the Organising Committee in planning the next EHDN Plenary Meeting and will assist in further improving format and contents. We would therefore appreciate very much that if you score less than "satisfactory" for any items could you please expand on your reasons in the comment box at the bottom of this form.

Please fill in the evaluation form now; this form will be available online for 6 weeks (up to 31 October 2014).

Please do not forget to hit the button Submit Feedback at the bottom once you have completed the form; otherwise your responses will not be transmitted to the database.

In order to submit a second feedback form, please CLICK HERE.
  
General
 Area of work/association with HD:
Clinician (MD)
Professional involved in care/assessments
Basic Scientist
Delegate of EHA/family member
Other
 Country of origin:
Sessions
 Quality of plenary session I: 'The Natural History of HD': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of plenary session II: 'Disease Modifiers': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of science session I: 'Targeting KMO': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of clinical practice session I: 'HD diagnosis': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Short Communications I: 'Scientific Presentations': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of plenary session III: 'Biomarkers': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Roundup I: poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Guided Poster Tour: 'Friday': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Breakfast Teaching Course: 'Saturday': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Which one did you attend:
 Quality of keynote session I: 'Systems Biology': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of science session II: 'Ongoing and planned clinical trials': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of clinical practice session II: 'Coping with HD': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of plenary session IV: 'Muscle and Non-Neurological Phenotype': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Short Communications II: poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of plenary session V: '10 Years EHDN + EDHN Business Meeting'': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Roundup II: poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Breakfast Teaching Course: 'Sunday': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Which one did you attend:
 Quality of plenary session VI: 'Gene and Protein Lowering Strategies': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of pkeynote session II: 'HD families in HD Research': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Roundup III and Poster Awards: poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Poster viewing: Quality of the posters presented: poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
 Quality of Evening Get Together: 'Tribute to 10 years EHDN': poor mediocre satisfactory good excellent
Meeting
poormediocresatisfactorygoodexcellent 
Overall impression          
Appropriateness of presentations for diverse audience          
Selection of topics          
Consideration given to pronouncing clearly & not speaking too quickly          
Time given for discussion          
Balance of meeting time and time to meet and relax          
Motivation when leaving the meeting          
Organisation and Stay
poormediocresatisfactorygoodexcellent 
Organisation of the meeting          
Choice of the time of year for holding the meeting          
Sufficient advance meeting information was given          
Presentation of EHDN 2014 on the internet          
Support given by the staff during my stay          
Usefulness of delegate packs          
Quality of catering service          
Organisation of evening events          
Suitability of venue          
Standard of accommodation          
Additional Feedback
 Comments: